Difference between revisions of "Advanced Simulation Methods SS 2019"
(→Part 3: Tasks) 
Tkobayashi (talk  contribs) (→Module 2: Maria Fyta, Takeshi Kobayashi: Atomistic Simulations of CoSolutes in Aqueous Solutions) 

Line 135:  Line 135:  
* T. Kobayashi <i>et al</i>, "The properties of residual water molecules in ionic liquids: a comparison between direct and inverse Kirkwood–Buff approaches", Phys.Chem.Chem.Phys. 19, 18924 (2017)  * T. Kobayashi <i>et al</i>, "The properties of residual water molecules in ionic liquids: a comparison between direct and inverse Kirkwood–Buff approaches", Phys.Chem.Chem.Phys. 19, 18924 (2017)  
−  === Part 2:  +  === Part 2: Simulations === 
−  +  
==== Description ====  ==== Description ====  
−  This part is practical. The simulations will be conducted by the software package GROMACS [http://www.gromacs.org/]. The students will  +  This part is practical. The simulations will be conducted by the software package GROMACS [http://www.gromacs.org/]. The students will perform the simulations of ionic liquids(IL)water mixtures at different water concentration in combination with the SPC/E water model. 
−  
−  ==== Force Fields for  +  First the student simulate pure water and pure IL ,and analyze the output data. Following properties will be calculated. The KirkwoodBuff theory will be used to calculate the KirkwoodBuff integrals. The student perform the different simulation box size to estimate the proper box size for calculating the properties. 
+  * KirkwoodBuff integrals  
+  * diffusion coefficients  
+  * mass densities  
+  In addition to above, for pure water  
+  * hydrogen bond life times and number of hydrogen bonds for waterwater pairs  
+  * water mean relaxation times  
+  
+  Next the student perform the ILwater mixtures at different water concentrations. After energy minimization and warm up, run 50 ns simulations with GROMACS for water mole fractions between X_H2O = 0  0.30.  
+  
+  In comparison to pure water/pure IL, the students will analyze several properties stated above and elucidate their water concentration dependent behavior.  
+  Interpret the corresponding results with regard to the findings in Phys.Chem.Chem.Phys. 19, 18924 (2017).  
+  <!  
+  ==== Force Fields for IL(EMImBF4) ====  
* {{Download hectoinzwittmp2.itp itpFile for Hydroxyectoine}}  * {{Download hectoinzwittmp2.itp itpFile for Hydroxyectoine}}  
Line 150:  Line 162:  
>  >  
−  
<!1. Implement the developed force fields for the osmolytes (urea, ectoine and hydroxyectoine) in combination with the SPC/E water model. After energy minimization and warm up, run 2030 ns simulations with GROMACS for osmolyte concentrations between c = 0  6 M.  <!1. Implement the developed force fields for the osmolytes (urea, ectoine and hydroxyectoine) in combination with the SPC/E water model. After energy minimization and warm up, run 2030 ns simulations with GROMACS for osmolyte concentrations between c = 0  6 M.  
Line 161:  Line 172:  
3. Calculate the radial distribution functions for all systems in terms of waterwater, waterosmolyte and osmolyteosmolyte pairs.  3. Calculate the radial distribution functions for all systems in terms of waterwater, waterosmolyte and osmolyteosmolyte pairs.  
Use this information to compute the  Use this information to compute the  
−  +  
* derivatives of the chemical activity  * derivatives of the chemical activity  
* derivatives of the activity coefficient  * derivatives of the activity coefficient 
Revision as of 11:31, 9 May 2019
A preliminary registration for this course is mandatory. Interested students should send an email to Maria Fyta until April 1st 2019.
First meeting: Friday, April 12 at 11:30 in the ICP meeting room (Allmandring 3, 1st floor, room 1.095).
Contents
 1 Overview
 2 Module 1: Maria Fyta, Frank Maier, Interatomic interactions modeled with quantum mechanical simulations
 3 Module 2: Maria Fyta, Takeshi Kobayashi: Atomistic Simulations of CoSolutes in Aqueous Solutions
 4 Module 3: Christian Holm, Rudolph Weeber Electrostatics, Lattice Boltzmann, and Electrokinetics
Overview
 Type
 Lecture and Tutorials (2 SWS in total)
 Lecturer
 Prof. Dr. Christian Holm, JP. Dr. Maria Fyta
 Course language
 English or German
 Location
 ICP, Allmandring 3; Room: ICP Meeting Room
 Time
 (see below)
The course will consist of three modules supervised by Prof. Dr. Christian Holm and JP. Dr. Maria Fyta. It will contain exercises, presentations, discussion meetings, and written reports, worked out in groups. Each group will have to give a talk for all modules. The students can work in groups. All groups should write a report of about 10 pages on each module, which they should submit to the responsible person for each module by the deadline set for each module.
Module 1: Maria Fyta, Frank Maier, Interatomic interactions modeled with quantum mechanical simulations
Dates
First meeting: Friday, April 12 at 11:30 in the ICP meeting room (Allmandring 3, 1st floor, room 1.095).
Final meeting and presentation: Friday, May 10 at 11:30 in the ICP meeting room (Allmandring 3, 1st floor, room 1.095).
Tutorials: Fridays 11:3013:00 in the ICP CIPPool. The first tutorial will take place on Wed. April 17 at 15:0016:30.
Deadline for reports: Mai 08, 2019
Description
This module focuses on the influence of using quantum mechanical simulations. The quantum mechanical schemes which will be applied in this module are based on density functional theory (DFT). This method allows the investigation of the electronic properties of a system. An understanding of the method, an analysis of the results from the simulations is the main goal of this module. The analysis of the simulations should be written up in a report. The talk will be a presentation of a DFTrelated journal paper. For this, one of the following papers can be chosen:
 Perspective: Advances and challenges in treating van der Waals dispersion forces in density functional theory, J. Klimeš and A. Michaelides, The Journal of Chemical Physics 137, 120901 (2012); doi: 10.1063/1.4754130
 Challenges for Density Functional Theory, A.J. Cohen, P. MoriSanchez, and W. Yang, Chemical Reviews 112, 289 (2012); dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr200107z.
Contact
If you have any questions regarding the organization or content of this module please do not hesitate to contact Maria Fyta. For practical guidance regarding the simulations Frank Uhlig.
Density functional theory and exchangecorrelation functionals
Description
This part introduces the students to the density functional theory (DFT) method. A scheme which has revolutionarized the way materials and their properties are studied. The students should focus on this method and understand how it works and which its capabilities are. A specific focus would be the different levels of approximations that can be made in this method. For this, the choice of the exchangecorrelation functional mapping the interactions of a system is crucial. To this end, the discussion in this module will be directed. The report should contain an introduction to the exchangecorrelation functionals in DFT in the context of the simulations and the analysis of the simulations in the tutorial.
Overall, a variety of DFT exchange correlation functionals have been developed. Some of these often fail in describe complex interactions. For example, only very advanced and quite recent density functionals are able to describe the longrange dispersion interactions [2]. Hence, effective methods based on pair potentials have been developed. These methods can achieve comparable accuracy to more ab initio methods while coming at a signifcantly lower computational effort [2,3].
[1] https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4754130
[2] https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.073005
[3] https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3382344
Tutorial
In this exercise you will test different exchange correlation functionals for two systems (silicon and graphite) and analyze the results. All simulations will be performed with the software package SIESTA. A thorough analysis of the stability and energetics of the two system is expected. Tutorial files and brief instructions can be found in ?. The software is installed on our CIP pool machines under /group/allatom/.
Files AdvSimMethoMod1.zip (11.89 MB)
Pseudopotential for LMKLLVDW C_VDW.psf (140 KB) (rename it to C.psf in order to use it in SIESTA)Literature
 A bird'seye view of densityfunctional theory, Klaus Capelle, arXiv:condmat/0211443 (2002).
 SelfConsistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects, W. Kohn and L.J. Sham, , Phys. Rev. (140), A1133 (1965).
 Understanding and Reducing Errors in Density Functional Calculations, MinCheol Kim, Eunji Sim, and Kieron Burke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 073003 (2013).
 Impact of the electronelectron correlation on phonon dispersion: Failure of LDA and GGA DFT functionals in graphene and graphite, Michele Lazzeri, Claudio Attaccalite, Ludger Wirtz, and Francesco Mauri, Phys. Rev. B 78, 081406(R) (2008).
 Electronic properties of nanographene sheets calculated using quantum chemical DFT
 Sangam Banerjeea, , Dhananjay Bhattacharyya, Computational Materials Science, 44, 41–45 (2008).
 Dependence of band structures on stacking and field in layered graphene, Masato Aoki, , Hiroshi Amawashi, Solid State Communications 142, 123–127 (2007).
 Graphite Interplanar Bonding: Electronic Delocalization and van der Waals Interaction, J.C. Charlier, X. Gonze and J.P. Michenaud, Europhysics Letters), 28 , 403 (1994).
Further reading (if interested)
 An application of the van der Waals density functional: Hydrogen bonding and stacking interactions between nucleobases, V.R. Cooper, T. Thonhauser, and D.C. Langreth, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 204102 (2008).
 On the accuracy of densityfunctional theory exchangecorrelation functionals for H bonds in small water clusters: Benchmarks approaching the complete basis set limit, B. Santra, A. Michaelides, and M. Scheffler, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 184104 (2007).
 On geometries of stacked and Hbonded nucleic acid base pairs determined at various DFT, MP2, and CCSD(T) levels up to the CCSD(T)/complete basis set limit level, I. Dąbkowska, P. Jurečka, and P. Hobza, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 204322 (2005).
Lecture Notes Module 1 (2.22 MB)
Module 2: Maria Fyta, Takeshi Kobayashi: Atomistic Simulations of CoSolutes in Aqueous Solutions
Dates
First meeting: Friday May 10 at 13:00 in the ICP meeting room.
Final meeting and presentation: Friday, June 07 at 11:30 in the ICP meeting room (Allmandring 3, 1st floor, room 1.095).
Tutorials: Fridays 11:3013:00 in the ICP CIPPool.
Deadline for reports: June 05, 2019
Description
This module focuses on atomistic Molecular Dynamics simulations and the study of biological cosolutes like urea, ectoine or hydroxyectoine and their influence on aqueous solutions. Biological cosolutes, often also called osmolytes are omnipresent in biological cells. A main function of these smallweight organic molecules is given by the protection of protein structures under harsh environmental conditions (protein stabilizers) or the denaturation of proteins (protein denaturants). The underlying mechanism leading to these effects is still unknown. It has been often discussed that osmolytes have a significant impact on the aqueous solution. The module consists of model development, simulation, analysis and oral and written presentation part.
Contact
If you have any questions regarding the organization or content of this module, please do not hesitate to contact Takeshi Kobayashi.
Part 1: Osmolytes and KirkwoodBuff Theory
Description
This part introduces the students to the field of osmolyte research. An important theory to study solvation and binding behavior is given by the KirkwoodBuff theory which can be well applied to computer simulations. The students should study the literature given below and present their findings. The presentation should at a minimum contain an introduction to KirkwoodBuff theory in the context of the simulations.
Literature
 D. R. Canchi and A. E. Garcia, "Cosolvent effects on protein stability", Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 64. 273 (2013)
 J. G. Kirkwood and F. P. Buff. "The statistical mechanical theory of solutions. I." J. Chem. Phys. 19, 774 (1951)
 V. Pierce, M. Kang, M. Aburi, S. Weerasinghe and P. E. Smith, "Recent applications of Kirkwood–Buff theory to biological systems", Cell Biochem. Biophys. 50, 1 (2008)
 S. Weerasinghe and P. E. Smith, "A Kirkwood–Buff derived force field for sodium chloride in water", The Journal of Chemical Physics 119, 11342 (2003).
 J. Rösgen, B. M. Pettitt and D. W. Bolen, "Protein folding, stability, and solvation structure in osmolyte solutions", Biophys. J. 89, 2988 (2005)
 J. Smiatek, "Osmolyte effects: Impact on the aqueous solution around charged and neutral spheres", J. Phys. Chem. B 118, 771 (2014)
 T. Kobayashi et al, "The properties of residual water molecules in ionic liquids: a comparison between direct and inverse Kirkwood–Buff approaches", Phys.Chem.Chem.Phys. 19, 18924 (2017)
Part 2: Simulations
Description
This part is practical. The simulations will be conducted by the software package GROMACS [1]. The students will perform the simulations of ionic liquids(IL)water mixtures at different water concentration in combination with the SPC/E water model.
First the student simulate pure water and pure IL ,and analyze the output data. Following properties will be calculated. The KirkwoodBuff theory will be used to calculate the KirkwoodBuff integrals. The student perform the different simulation box size to estimate the proper box size for calculating the properties.
 KirkwoodBuff integrals
 diffusion coefficients
 mass densities
In addition to above, for pure water
 hydrogen bond life times and number of hydrogen bonds for waterwater pairs
 water mean relaxation times
Next the student perform the ILwater mixtures at different water concentrations. After energy minimization and warm up, run 50 ns simulations with GROMACS for water mole fractions between X_H2O = 0  0.30.
In comparison to pure water/pure IL, the students will analyze several properties stated above and elucidate their water concentration dependent behavior. Interpret the corresponding results with regard to the findings in Phys.Chem.Chem.Phys. 19, 18924 (2017).
Module 3: Christian Holm, Rudolph Weeber Electrostatics, Lattice Boltzmann, and Electrokinetics
Dates
First meeting: June 21 at 11:30 in the ICP meeting room.
Final meeting and presentation: Friday, July 19 at 11:30 in the ICP meeting room (Allmandring 3, 1st floor, room 1.095).
Tutorials: Fridays 11:3013:00 in the ICP CIPPool.
Deadline for reports: July 17, 2019
Description
This module focuses on charged matter with electrostatic and hydrodynamic interactions. It should be taken in groups of three people. It consists of one lecture on electrostatic algorithms, simulations, theory, a presentation and a short report on the simulation results. You only have to give one common presentation and hand in one report. The Module 3 consists of three parts:
Contact
If you have any questions regarding the organisation or content of this module please do not hesitate to contact Christian Holm. For questions regarding the practical part of the module and technical help contact David Sean.
Part 1: Electrostatics
Description
This part is about the theory of electrostatic algorithms for molecular dynamics simulations. It is concerned with state of the art algorithms beyond the Ewald sum, especially mesh Ewald methods. To this end the students should read the referenced literature. Christian Holm will give an hour long lecture. Afterwards we will discuss the content and try to resolve open questions. The presentation should foster the students understanding of the P3M method as well as give them an overview of its performance compared to other modern electrostatics methods.
Literature
 C. Holm.
"Simulating Long range interactions".
Institute for Computational Physics, Universitat Stuttgart, 2018.
[PDF] (15.4 MB)
 C. Holm.

Markus Deserno and Christian Holm.
"How to mesh up Ewald sums. I. A theoretical and numerical comparison of various particle mesh routines".
Journal of Chemical Physics 109(7678), 1998.
[PDF] (307 KB) [DOI] 
Arnold, Axel and Fahrenberger, Florian and Holm, Christian and Lenz, Olaf and Bolten, Matthias and Dachsel, Holger and Halver, Rene and Kabadshow, Ivo and Gähler, Franz and Heber, Frederik and Iseringhausen, Julian and Hofmann, Michael and Pippig, Michael and Potts, Daniel and Sutmann, Godehard.
"Comparison of scalable fast methods for longrange interactions".
Physical Review E 88(063308), 2013.
[PDF] (3 MB) [DOI] 
Axel Arnold and Christian Holm.
"Efficient methods to compute long range interactions for soft matter systems".
In Advanced Computer Simulation Approaches for Soft Matter Sciences II, volume II of Advances in Polymer Sciences, pages 59–109. Editors: C. Holm and K. Kremer,
Springer, Berlin, 2005.
[PDF] (2 MB) [DOI]
Part 2: ElectroOsmotic Flow
Description
This part is practical. It is concerned with the movement of ions in an charged slit pore. It is similar to the systems that are discussed in the Bachelors thesis of Georg Rempfer which is recommended reading. A slit pore consists of two infinite charge walls as shown in the figure to the right. In this exercise you should simulate such a system with ESPResSo. You are supposed to use a Lattice Boltzmann fluid coupled to explicit ions which are represented by charge WeekChandlerAnderson spheres. In addition to the charge on the walls, the ions are also subject to an external electrical field parallel to the walls. Electrostatics should be handled by the P3M algorithm with ELC. A set of realistic parameters and an more in detail description of the system can be found in the thesis. You should measure the flow profile of the fluid and the density and velocity profiles of the ions. The case of the slit pore can be solved analytically either in the case of only counter ions (the so called salt free case) or in the high salt limit (DebyeHueckelLimit). Calculate the ion profiles in one or both of these cases and compare the results with the simulation.
Worksheet
Detailed worksheet (92 KB)
Literature
Some ESPResSo tutorials can be helpful.
 General part and parts 4 & 6 of the LatticeBoltzmann tutorial
 Part 7 of the charged systems tutorial to see how to setup proper electrostatics in quasi2D geometry.
 Georg Rempfer, "LatticeBoltzmann Simulations in Complex Geometries" (1.36 MB), 2010, Institute for Computational Physics, Stuttgart
Part 3: Electrophoresis of Polyelectrolytes
Description
In this part you simulate the movement of a charged polymer under the influence of an external electrical field and hydrodynamic interactions. Set up a system consisting of a charged polymer, ions with the opposite charge to make the system neutral and an Lattice Boltzmann fluid coupled with the the ions and polymer. Apply an external field and measure the center of mass velocity of the polymer as a function of the length of the polymer for polymers of one to 20 monomers. Make sure the system is in equilibrium before you start the sampling. Compare your result to theory and experimental results (see literature).
Worksheet
Detailed worksheet (93 KB)
Instructions and Literature
General part and part 5 of Media:04lattice_boltzmann.pdf

Kai Grass and Ute Böhme and Ulrich Scheler and Hervé Cottet and Christian Holm.
"Importance of Hydrodynamic Shielding for the Dynamic Behavior of Short Polyelectrolyte Chains".
Physical Review Letters 100(096104), 2008.
[PDF] (115 KB) [DOI] 
Grass, Kai Christian.
"Towards realistic modelling of free solution electrophoresis: a case study on charged macromolecules".
PhD thesis, GoetheUniversität Frankfurt am Main, 2008.
[PDF] (6 MB)
Report
At the final meeting day of this module, one group will give a presentation about the learned and performed work. In addition, they write a report of about 5 pages containing and discussing the obtained results and hand it in together with the reports of the other modules at the end of the course (see above).
The final report is due electronically Friday night, TBA