Polyelectrolyte Multilayers

From ICPWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

What is a Polyelectolyte Multilayer (PEM)?

PEMs are composed of alternating layers of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes (PEs) (synthetic PEs or biomolecules), which are generally built up based on the Layer-by-Layer technique. [1,2] Due to their potential applications as membrane, encapsulation and matrix materials, and for enzymes and proteins in sensor applications, PEMs have stimulated great interests from both academic researchers and industries.[3] See also a PEM website. Despite the large number of experimental works, theoretical and computational studies toward understanding the microscopic structure of PEMs are scarce.[4]

Our Research

In close collaboration with experimental investigations from groups of Prof. von Klitzing and Prof. Hugel, we are currently working to investigate the inner structure and dynamics of a small layer number of PEMs via all-atom (AA) and coarse-grained (CG) simulations. The project is funded by the DFG SPP 1369: Polymer-Solid Contacts: Interfaces and Interphases Spp1369 logo small.jpg

Schematic representation of PSS and PDADMA.

The AA level simulations proved to be consistent with existing experimental data on chain conformation of adsorbed poly(styrene sulfonate) (PSS) in PSS monolayer systems, dielectric permittivity and diffusion constant of water in PSS/PDADMA polyelectrolyte complexes (PDADMA stand for poly(diallyldimethylammonium)).

So far, we are building the PSS/PDADMA bilayers based on the previously obtained PSS monolayers and we are expecting to extract exciting information from these studies. The simulation of a bilayer represents our final goal for atomistic simulations of PMEs so far, due to the high requirement of computer resources (ca. 1000 000 cpu hours in total).

Due to the limitations of atomistic simulations, further insight into structure and dynamics of PEMs can be achieved only with simulations at CG level. Qualitative understanding and agreement with experiments has been obtained by us using the already existing generic bead-spring PE model. However, a refined CG PE model is needed in order to be quantitatively predictive. This is part of our next working program.

Some selected results obtained during the last 2.5 years are:

a) Bilayer thermodynamical instability

Thermodynamic instability of the bilayer and the stability of the fast deposited tri-layer.

Our CG level simulations have shown that depending on the relative strength of the monomer-monomer and monomer-surface interaction energies, a progressive redissolution of the first bilayer or a partial dewetting resulting in a disordered melt can happen.

We have shown that a fast enough deposition of the third layer -- before the aging process -- can prevent such redissolution or partial dewetting and provide the stability needed to form a PEM. We have checked that the deposition of further layers is a stable process. This suggests that the first PE bilayer is not thermodynamically stable, while tri-layers and higher layers are stable, at least within the long run time of our simulations.

b) Charge compensation mechanism

Possibilities of sulfurs from PSS and nitrogens from PDADMA which are intrinsically and extrinsically charge compensated.

In our AA level simulations on PSS/PDADMA complexes, intrinsic (polyanions pair with polycations) and extrinsic (polyions pair with salt ions) charge compensation mechanisms have been found to co-exist, although the intrinsic one is predominant in the investigated salt (NaCl) concentration range from 0.17 to 1.00 mol/L.

Furthermore, the relative scale of the interaction energy of the ion-pairs in such PSS/PDADMA mixture is calculated to follow (in kJ/mol): Na-Cl (-520) > PSS-Na (-420) > PDADMA-Cl (-280) ~ PSS-PDADMA (-270). The relative scale of the interaction energy can be very useful to explain some experimental finding, such as PSS is found to be in a higher concentration than PDADMA in PSS/ PDADMA complexes [5]. This information is also valuable to properly model the interactions between ion-pairs in the upcoming refined CG model.

c) PSS adsorption monolayer

PSS adsorption monolayer

The PSS monolayer is diposited from a PSS solution via atomistic simulations. Our results demonstrate that short-range interactions of van der Waals origin from the adsorbing substrate play a significant role in the layer structure of the adsorbed PSS, and they alone are already sufficient to induce a stable PSS adsorption layer. The PSS chains are found to behave as hydrophilic PEs, two kinds of conformations of which are observed: flat PSS adsorption layer dominates with some adsorbed PSS chains dangling into the above PSS solution.

d) PE chain pulling experiment

Results from our CG simulations
Exp. data from Hugel's group

The present, non-refined CG model yields a qualitative agreement with the experiments by the Hugel group. This makes us confident that maybe even a quantitative comparison might be obtainable once the refined coarse-grained model will be ready.

In the computer simulations on PE pulling experiments, a PE chain, which is similar to the PE chains of the capping layer, is introduced with the corresponding counterions. The averaged force, that is needed to keep one of the chain ends fixed at a given point Z_{tip}, is measured by performing several independent runs. The position of the chain tip is slowly increased to a new value where a new measurement was performed.




[1] J. Schmitt, G. Decher and G. Hong. Thin Solid Films, 1992, 210/211, 831.URL

[2] G. Decher, Science,1997, 277, 1232. URL

[3] J. B. Schlenoff, Langmuir, 2009, 25, 14007.URL

[4] A. V. Dobrynin. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci, 2008, 13, 376.URL

[5] H. H. Hariri, and J. B. Schlenoff, Macromolecules, 2010, DOI: 10.1021/ma1012978. URL